Retroarch github
![retroarch github retroarch github](https://forums.libretro.com/uploads/default/original/2X/0/0a4dcb517a8e705855a6715791958575efd1f039.png)
The only other option is to go with the actual emulators themselves instead of using the LibRetro cores (based on said emulators) that RetroArch utilizes.
#Retroarch github windows#
I will note that MAME is notorious for being user-unfriendly, so you may want to consider seeking help from somebody who is experienced with MAME (to learn the ropes & quirks) & possibly going with a distro like MAMEui, which provides a Windows GUI that makes it a little user-friendlier. The MAME dev groups are dedicated to execution accuracy over ROM compatibility or speed (similar to BSNES / Higan) While it may not have all the bells & whistles that RetroArch has, it does have all the core features that MAME includes. As such, it does have support for the Nintendo consoles. Since MESS (Multi-Emulator Super System) was merged into MAME as of with v0.162 onward. Have you consider MAME, or one of it's distros / forks? I'M ACTUALLY SERIOUS ABOUT THIS! I hope you can find a solution to meet your needs :-) I've gotten used to RetroArch and (so far, fingers crossed) I haven't had any deal breaking issues that I couldn't figure out. Either frontend has the advantage of letting you use the latest and greatest emulator releases before they are ported over to RA as cores, and since the original emus work better in some cases than their RA core counterparts, this could scratch your itch and then some, if you want to go through the setup. Launchbox is for Windows devices and is a bit easier to set up, but requires a premium for certain features. ES is the frontend used on RetroPie for Raspberry Pi devices, and on several low-powered emulation handhelds that are popular right now. But so far, I don't have a qualifying device to try them out on.Īnother option to consider would be a frontend like EmulationStation or Launchbox, which can be set up to work with most stand-alone emulators, instead of going with the all-in-one route of RetroArch. The latter works best on a jailbroken device, so I've read. OpenEmu for Macs and Provenance for iOS/tvOS, if interested. Īpart from MAME, there are a couple of compelling multi-machine alternatives that I've always wanted to try.
#Retroarch github code#
If it is a code issue, then consider making an issue at. To change this behavior, open ~/.config/retroarch/retroarch.cfg and set autosave_interval to n.īut in the long run, this problem should be resolved. Here a quote from Archwiki (its a Linux, but it applies here too): Įnabling SaveRAM Autosave Interval By default, RetroArch only writes SRAM onto disk when it exits without error, which means that there is a risk of losing save data when using crash-prone cores. Its value is in seconds, which means 300 evaluates to saving automatically every 5 minutes. Look in your "retroarch.cfg" for an key autosave_interval. If it is about the last saved state, maybe an autosave function would help. In example, you could setup a script which creates a backup of your save files when starting RetroArch.
#Retroarch github update#
I don't know about alternatives, but how about solving this issue? What does "lose my save file" mean in this context? Does the files get deleted, corrupted or do you mean it did not write to update the last state of the save file? At least backups would cover losing the files entirely.